equality英语作文

In this stimulating work of political philosophy, acclaimed philosopher G. A. Cohen sets out to rescue the egalitarian thesis that in a society in which distributive justice prevails, people’s material prospects are roughly equal. Arguing against the Rawlsian version of a just society, Cohen demonstrates that distributive justice does not tolerate deep inequality.In the course of providing a deep and sophisticated critique of Rawls’s theory of justice, Cohen demonstrates that questions of distributive justice arise not only for the state but also for people in their daily lives. The right rules for the macro scale of public institutions and policies also apply, with suitable adjustments, to the micro level of individual decision-making.Cohen also charges Rawls’s constructivism with systematically conflating the concept of justice with other concepts. Within the Rawlsian architectonic, justice is not distinguished either from other values or from optimal rules of social regulation. The elimination of those conflations brings justice closer to equality.

On Equality In the days when a woman’s entire obligation was to be a good daughter, a good wife and a good mother, men and women were far from equal. Women suffered sexual discrimination until the so-called feminism came into being. Nowadays, feminism has been running for over a century. Result? It ran into the extreme of "equality" from my perspective. Most of us agree that men and women should enjoy equality in this modern society. But what on earth does this equality mean? To be "equal", those for feminism would like to share everything with men they split bills, apply for masculine jobs,etc. They intended to buy in all the advantages and disadvantages of being a man. On their long journey to the "equal world",they’ve forgotten some basic facts they ARE women. Even school children know that women, after all, are different from men both physically and mentally. It is unwise, or even stupid,to ignore all these differences and pursue a so called "equal world". We couldn’t expect a man to give birth to a baby as we couldn’t expect the sun to rise in the west. Likewise, we couldn’t expect a woman to become the world’s fastest runner,as is simple, but seems forgotten by those feminists. Equality is not bisecting everything. Real equality should be built upon the common sense of the basic sexual differences.Since some of the jobs can only be done well enough by men,women should not feel discriminated when we fail. After all,there’re also some jobs, which can only be perfectly done with women’s hands. These are not symbols of inequality, but natural laws. What really counts is equality in rights, reputation,etc. Only when all the individuals value the spirit of being equal can women really enjoy equality with men

范例1：From the picture above which illustrates that people of different height standing on the same boxes to watch the football game, we will find something familiar with us in our daily life which always led to a hit discussion on the internet for arguing which is more important than the other, that’s to say, is the equality outweighs the justice or the other way around.In view of my limited knowledge, I place the justice into the first place for the reason that the equality in fact is the real equality which requires personalization. The one who is hungry should not be given the books ,which is ultimately ridiculous. In reality, we ordinary people are devastated by the high price of housing. What we need most is the policy to help us unburden the pressure other than figuring out the causes why the Starbucks in mainland is more expensive than in the other places.