SSpapergirl
英语教学中网络技术的应用
近几年来,计算机技术和网络技术有了突飞猛进的进步,信息化、网络化时代的来临对人们的生活带来了重大的影响,人们越来越重视网络技术在生活中的应用。下面是我为大家搜索整理了关于英语教学中网络技术的应用,欢迎阅读参考,希望对大家有所帮助。想了解更多相关信息请持续关注我们应届毕业生培训网!
随着科技时代的到来,多媒体和互联网已经随着计算机技术的迅速发展而日渐普及。在很多高校中,都已纷纷建立了校园网络、配备语音实验室,教室内安装幻灯、投影仪等,许多多媒体和网络资源纷纷走进校园。外语教学进行改革后,多媒体技术成了英语教学的一个重要手段,在英语视听说教学中,网络技术更是得到了广泛应用,为学生提供了一个学习英语的良好的视听语言学习环境,促使英语教学改革得到了突破性的进展,有利于把传统的 封闭模式转变为开放性模式。在网络英语教学模式中,网络技术是支撑,这种模式重视结果,更重视过程,通过把网络资源和英语教学相结合的方式,激发了学生自主学习的潜质。把网络技术应用到英语教学中,可以把课堂教学和远程学习结合起来,让学生积极主动的去体验、去学习,和传统的课堂教学相比,具有明显的优势和特点。
一、在大学英语教学中应用网络技术的优势
1、应用网络技术可以很大程度的激发学生的学习兴趣,提高学习积极性
学习活动是一种在情感参与下理性的思维活动。在以往的传统教学中,教师把要讲的内容写在黑板上,单一枯燥的教学模式让学生对学习失去了兴趣,这种消极的感情色彩通常会降低学生的积极性,从而影响学习效率和教学效果。应用网络技术可以把枯燥的教学内容转变为有声有色、图文并茂的形式,可以促使学生产生极高的兴趣和良好的学习情绪。学生通过生动、形象的图片、声音、文字等,可以快速的理解教学要求,这是笑话吸收知识的最佳选择。例如,在讲授单纯的英文文字教材的时候,可以配上英文朗读模式的音频,也可以播放一部英文原声电影来激发学生的学习热情,同时还锻炼了视听能力。学生可以从传统课堂中的被动学习者转变为网络课堂上的主动学习者。
2、通过运用多种技术手段, 有利于提高教学质量
在网络教学中,通常会用到很多先进的科技技术,如符号、声音、录像、图片等,通过这些技术可以重新再现教学的内容,让学生完全融入到语言环境中。另外,通过多种手段相结合的方式,可以让学生从更多的角度去掌握知识点,加深记忆,网络教学模式可以巩固学习效果,从而大大提高了教学的质量,达到预期的效果。
3、使用网络技术可以提高教师的全面素质
合理有效的使用多媒体网络技术就需要教师学习并且熟练掌握现代化的教育技术手段。在应用多媒体的过程中,教师可以不断提高自身的应用的能力,做到教学相长。在英语教学中应用网络技术,教师是主要是操作员,是课程能保质保量完成的关键。教师首先要掌握好教学的目标、学生的具体状况以及授课要求等来准备课程内容,同时还要做好信息资料的选取、编辑、加工等。这些工作内容就要求教师在熟练掌握多媒体技术和网络通讯技术,熟练操作flash, PowerPoint 等软件。作为信息的传播者、加工者,教师的计算机知识一定要跟上网络媒体技术的发展,拓宽知识面,便于教师全面的提升素质。
4、应用网络技术的其他优点
教师在多媒体教室上课的时候,用语音讲解上课,教室内前中后排的学生都可以收到相同的教学效果,弥补了听力训练不足的缺陷。教师可以根据学生不同的学习情况去调整教学进度和教学计划,真正的做到因材施教。
通过教师精心设计的教学内容,可以全面具体的展示出教材要点和学习任务。在教学过程中能够调动学生的思维,帮助学生积极主动的去思考课程中所遇到的问题,有助于激发学生的潜力。
教学内容通常是分为不同阶段和不同层次的,在英语教学中运用网络技术可以轻松巧妙的设立互动式教学环境,激起学生的新鲜感和求知欲,在一个轻松的学习氛围中,能够更好的促进学生主观能动性的发挥和个性的自我展示。
互联网是一个巨大的资料库,信息量巨大,且信息更新速度快。把网络技术作为英语教学的一种重要手段,可以把大量的知识和信息展示给学生,让他们可以随意找到自己需要的`信息,不再受到时间和空间上的限制。学生通过图、文、声、像想结合的多媒体课件,可以拓展视野,增强学生对英语环境的理解。让语言与知识相结合,达到了最佳的教学效果。
二、网络技术在英语教学中的应用特点
我们已经了解了网络教学的一些优势,利用这些优势,可以培养学生的配合能力和独立思考能力,在形象逼真、动静结合的语言环境中,教师可以通过巧妙的指导的启发,帮助学生在大脑中构建一个系统的知识网络。那么网络技术在教学中有什么特点呢?下面笔者将给与简单的介绍:
1、根据网络本身资源丰富且信息量大的优势,就表明它具有全方位的开放性的特点。把英语教学与互联网相结合,可以让学生及时了解当前最新的消息和最前沿、最流行的英语素材。通过网络教学,学生的学习就不再局限于课堂上,获取信息的渠道也不再单一,这样一个强大的信息支撑和依靠,英语教学步入了一个开放性的时代。
2、在以往的英语学习中,知识往往都是来源于书本,以固定的教材为主,所学知识单一,且陈旧,教材的更新速度慢,一个版本通常会用几年,甚至十几年。利用网络技术后,学生的学习兴趣可以大大的提高,随时都能了解到最新的英文资讯和英美国家的电子刊物,例如《纽约时报》、《今日美国》等报刊杂志都能随时获得,丰富了学生的知识面,这体现了网络教学更新速度快的特点。
3、根据英语教学改革的要求,教师需要树立新型教学理念,改变以往的陈旧思想,要“教适应学”。在英语教学的过程中,要从以教师为中心向以学生为主体的方向转变。在网络技术教学中,教师由原来传统知识的灌输者的角色中走出来,成为了学生的指挥者和引导者。在网络化英语教学中,学生不再被动的去听、去写,而是要积极主动的去说、去表达,这就体现了网络化教学的改革性和灵活性。。
英语教学课程改革后,网络技术在英语教学的作用越来越重要。在科技高速发展的今天,我们不能停滞不前,要紧紧跟上科技发展的 步伐,在英语教学中,仍然采用传统的在黑板上写画的模式已经远远不能满足社会的需求和学生的需求。利用网络技术来辅助教学,可以为学生的创造性思维提供一个更加广阔的前景,可以提升他们的语言综合运用能力和创新实践能力。网络技术的应用为广大师生创造了一个良好的教学环境,学生可以充分利用这个教学辅助工具和巨大的资源库来获取知识、处理知识、运用知识,使英语课堂变得不再枯燥乏味,让英语学习变得有趣起来。
不让一个字注册
Uses and Gratifications (U & G) is a communications theory paradigm developed to understand media-use motivations. This research paradigm has recently been applied to understand motivations for Internet use. Internet U & G typically orient to distinct process-based, content-based, and socially based motivations for use of the network. This study applies U & G to examine the Internet usage motivations of technology students enrolled in an Internet-enabled distance education course and finds that digital content is highly sought after by students in Internet-supported distance education classes. Distance education students are also motivated to use Internet communication resources to offset the lack of social interaction found in normal classrooms. Students' Internet usage process motivations actually diverge into two distinct areas, related generally to searching versus browsing in the support of learning objectives.Psychologists have bee studying abnormal Internet use since the late 1990s. In another article I discussed a presentation on pathological Internet use by Mark Griffiths at the American Psychological Association's 1997 annual convention. Griffiths used a model of addiction to analyze the behavior of several different people who had problems with their Internet use. What is normal Internet use? Several different answers were presented as a part of a symposium at APA. Victor Brenner studied Internet use through a World Wide Web survey. His preliminary results were published in Psychological Reports in 1997. He presented further results at APA that were consistent with the earlier results.Brenner's subjects reported an average of 19 hours per week of Internet use. Many reported up to 10 signs of interference in role functioning (primarily failure to manage time, missing sleep, missing meals, etc.) . A surprising result is that 80% of the sample reported at least five of these signs. These numbers suggest that the presence of some level of these problems is normal, and therefore should not be considered as pathological. The Internet seems to be a compelling medium, and some disruption in our lives is normal if we spend much time online.Other studies have come up with different numbers. Kathleen Scherer studied 531 students at the University of Texas at Austin. 381 students who used the Internet at least once per week were studied further. 49 of these students (13%) were classified as "Internet dependent" because they had at least 3 out of 10 problems which parallel chemical dependencies. 71% of the "dependent" users were men and 29% were women. "Dependent" users averaged only 11 hours per week online while the average for the whole sample was 8 hours. Defining people as "dependent" based on their self-report of three problems seems a bit excessive in light of Brenner's study.Scherer's numbers are probably lower than Brenner's for several reasons. She used a college sample and recruited from a cross-section of students. Brenner recruited online and his technique would have attracted heavy Net users. The more time you spend online the more likely you are to stumble across the survey.Janet Morahan-Martin and Phyllis Schumaker presented the results of a study which support Scherer's lower numbers. They surveyed 283 college students in courses which required Internet use. They measured pathological use by administering a 13 item survey which assessed evidence that the Internet was causing personal problems, withdrawal symptoms and mood altering use.They classified users into three groups. Pathological users averaged 8.5 hours of Internet use per week, persons with limited symptoms averaged 3.2 hours per week, and those with no symptoms averaged 2.4 hours per week.Pathological users also differed from other users in other ways. They reported significantly more loneliness (as measured by the UCLA Loneliness Scale). They used online games more than other users, and they also used more technologically sophisticated aspects of the net (such as FTP, virtual reality, and remote support communication software) more than other students. They did not use Internet Relay Chat more than other students.What is normal Internet use? We still don't know. For the majority of the population normal Internet use remains zero hours per week. Studies suggest that some college students average 8 hours or so per week, and web surfers can average 20 hours online without having major problems. What you do online may be as important as how long you spend online. Some online activities seem to be more compelling and potentially "addictive" than others. Games and chat have been mentioned in this context, although these studies found limited support for the addictiveness of chat.When is Internet use pathological? The simple answer: when it gets in the way of the rest of your life. Addictions involve "compulsive use despite harm." The longer definition of addiction in the previous article illustrates some ways that substances and activities can get in the way. Look for more research in the next few years as we wrestle with these issues.While Internet use patterns may have changed since 1997, some people still develop problems. If you are having a problem with excessive Internet use you may want to see a therapist in person. Online help is probably not ideal for pathological Internet use since it contributes to even more time online. Internet World Stats is an International website that features up to date world Internet Usage, Population Statistics and Internet Market Research Data, for over 233 individual countries and world regions. See the Big Picture here.Internet World Stats is a useful resource for online international market research, containing the latest Internet statistics, broadband and penetration data, world population statistics and telecommunications markets information and reports.Site navigation and usability has been made easy with active links at the bottom of most pages and content menus on the left hand side column of main pages. This site also offers useful links to telecommunications country reports, maps, statistics sources, local directories, and population information. For a complete description of the content and surfing tips, visit the Site Guide.