交通肇事者英文

Traffic hit and run交通肇事逃逸

Hit-and-run causing death, "a crime Qualcomm said that criminal acts by the object of the crime, criminal objective elements, the main crime, crime subjective elements such as a four elements. From now on the four elements of the "Hit-and-run causing death" constitute research. (1) the object of the crime 1 the Crime of the object of the crime Criminal Code traffic accident caused the death of people escape the regulatory system is the Penal Code Sections 133 points on the Crime of provisions. Speaking from the provisions of the Penal Code, provides traffic accident in the crime of endangering public safety in the crime. Obviously, the traffic accident is a crime of the crime of endangering public safety, it is theoretically in the Penal Code have no objection to. "Hit-and-run causing death" as a traffic accident aggravated crimes committed in particular should belong to the crime of endangering public safety. A matter of course, public safety is the traffic accident, including the crime of endangering public safety, the crime of similar objects, and only through the object of this kind of analysis can reveal such crimes and the essential characteristics of the common. In the theory of the Penal Code, because of the public's understanding of different, and therefore the object of public crimes also exist different views. A view that the public crime is not the object of a specific person's life, health or property of a second view that the public crime is the object of most people's lives, physical safety or property; third view that Public crime is not the object of specific and most of the life, physical safety or property; fourth view is that the public crime is not the object of specific people or the majority of people's life, health or property. China's Criminal Law to take the majority of the third view that public safety is not specific health and the lives of the majority of major private and public property and public production, and life safety. Obviously the above view is the difference between a clear, whether in the number of the majority, whether the target is specific, or that the two are still with the relationship. ① "qualified majority" of the statement meant that the majority of people specific to the life, health or property security, and not a specific person's life, health or property safety, not public safety. According to this view, the majority of the people for specific acts did not constitute a crime, it appears to reduce the crime of endangering public safety. Indeed also does not conform with the judicial practice. For example, some traffic violation causing the accident acts only against a specific majority of the people life, health or property security, or just the majority of people against a specific life, health or property security, but the judiciary still be identified as traffic offences . Pay attention to the acts of "public" interests of the violations, the crime of endangering public safety provisions of the Penal Code is designed to life, health, property, and other abstract personal interests to protect the interests of the community as a target, and it should pay attention to their social nature. "Public" and "social" demands the attention of "the majority." In other words, the "majority" is the core of public safety. Therefore, the majority of people's life, health or property of the view that public safety should be the object of the crime should have meaning. Two, and so a "minority" of the occasion is not necessarily excluded from the "public safety" outside. Generally is the case. For example, the life and health of an individual is not the crime of endangering public safety crime. However, "minority" If it is "not specific", it means that at any time the "majority" of the development of realistic possibilities, the members of the general community will feel dangerous, the majority of people may have suffered damage. Therefore, not specific to the life, health, property security, public safety --------------------------------------好长的一段啊！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！111111111111111111

非常非常没有把握的答案~~With the continuous development，cars become increasingly indispensable means of transport, motor vehicle violation for driving, especially drunk driving penalties, I believe is no longer a temporary suspension or a fine of a few days driver's license can be solved the problem. But drinking and driving laws in our country there are inadequacies in the legal system, whose main responsibility is reflected in current law is too light, drunk driving is just fine, temporary suspension driver's license and the administrative detention punishment; non-uniform application of law, "Meanwhile the different crimes," "with various criminal offenses," the phenomenon has occurred; imperfect law, driving under the influence of criminal responsibility to identify, is "the Crime of" or "way to other dangerous crimes endangering public security" to qualitatively there is no uniform concept. Drunk driving accident on the existing law behavior found there is a certain bias, therefore, improve our penalties on drunk driving regulations imminent. China's civil law on drink-driving system with the administrative regulations on drinking and driving penalties also made some provisions. In addition, we should be good traffic order on the culture and to promote legal awareness and training.