复杂法律英语翻译

法律[fǎ lǜ]law; statute; codex; codices; doom ;

虽然某些程序的行为（如答复预审法官1检察征用或通知上诉到上诉法院）必须承担一个固定的天数，整个程序是没有分隔在这样做。 事实上，实行严格的时限，一般被认为是阻碍适当的司法行政，防止预审法官进行彻底的调查。

The expert's conclusion needs proved to be true realizing the evidence function through the proper proceduring as one of the legal evidences. However, are tried and determined the way was influenced, our country has not set up relevant lawsuit systems that the evidence is investigated and verified yet by the traditional functions and powers. Party doctrine and adversary system modern lawsuit soul of system, of our country judicial expertise problem that reform solves emphatically one of too. Expert Great Britain American and French department national evidence important component of system in system in witness. Expert refer to permit until their is for answers of question enclosed and help jury not to be lasted those witness complicatedness that prove unables generals to witness because of having expert's qualifications or Witness of the technological question.In Great Britain American and French department country, surveyor serve as general witness come, treat witness to regard as broad sense. System, witness of expert, embody a concentrated reflection of to party lawsuit protection of right determine start right assign, in the cross-examination course to expert's evidence. A lot of problems exist in the judicial expertise procedures to review our country, I pass the comparative analysis method, think that needs to pay attention to the following several respect in the construction of our country's relevant systems: Good at promoting entity's justice with procedure justice, pay attention to guaranteeing telling in the lawsuit right can be really realized of the party; The court should possess the ability to investigate the case fact in the qualification procedure operation which oppose the competition, utilize abuse of expert's evidence and right of the other side of restriction looks rationally.Through determining to our country the procedure proposes the suggestion is as follows: Confirm a surveyor in legislating as witness' legal status of the expert, confirm the party determine that starts content and range of right at the same time, give party engage or trust expert right of witness, strengthen expert witness appear in court system to accept cross-examination, the strong guarantee party puts the right, right of being in know and cross-examination right to the proof, thus establish the proper procedure to protect.

Whilst certain procedural acts (such as the reply by the examining magistrate a prosecutor`s requisition or the notification of an appeal to the appeal court ) must be undertaken within a fixed number of days, the entire procedure is not delimited in this way. indeed , the rigid imposition of general time limits is considered to obstruct the proper administration of justice by preventing the examining magistrate from carrying out a thorough investigation .虽然某些程序的行为（如答复预审法官1检察征用或通知上诉到上诉法院）必须承担一个固定的天数，整个程序是没有分隔在这样做。事实上，实行严格的时限，一般被认为是阻碍适当的司法行政，防止预审法官进行彻底的调查。It is fair to say that middle-range offences (i.e.delits ) may be dealt with under a procedure that is considerably quicker than that employed in England. Sentence is frequently handed down by the correctional court on the same day that the police investigation is completed and within 48 hours of arrest. However, the procedure is considerably slower as regards serious cases (i.e. crimes and more complex cases of delit where an examining magistrate is involved) than its English equivalent. The instruction constitutes the lengthiest aspect of the procedure. Indeed, the examining magistrate is considered to be the appropriate judge of the time necessary. Nevertheless, article 5.3 of the ECHR requires that pre-trial remands in custody should not extend beyond a reasonable time and article 6.1 obliges the trial court to reach a final 这是公平地说，中距离的罪行（ iedelits ） ，可处理下一个程序，这是相当快，比受雇在英格兰。一句是经常传世由惩教法院于同日表示，警方在完成调查，并在48小时内逮捕。但是，该过程是相当慢，至于严重的情况下（即犯罪和更复杂的案件delit凡预审法官是涉及） ，比其英语同等学历。指示构成lengthiest方面的程序。事实上，预审法官被认为是适当的法官所需的时间。不过，第5.3条的规定，欧洲人权法庭审判前remands在羁押不应当延伸超出一个合理的时间和第6.1条规定，审判法庭达成一项最后