• 回答数

    2

  • 浏览数

    349

默灬小米
首页 > 英语培训 > 简短英文论文阅读

2个回答 默认排序
  • 默认排序
  • 按时间排序

小xiao贱

已采纳

英语-ly副词与其同源副词的用法比较 英语中有一些表示方式、 程度的副词具有两种形式。 如late,lately; high,highly;slow,showly等 等。在这些词当中,两种不同形式所表达的含 义有的完全不同,有的很相似,而有的却完全一致。这就给人们 使用这些词时 带来一定的麻烦。特别是在学生中间,总免不了使用时的混淆。笔者想就此问题 分类作一点探讨 。(一)本类词有hard,hardly;late,lately;most,mostly等等,这两 种副词形式含义完全不同,所以 ,使用时不易引起混淆。1.He works hard all day.他整天都在使劲地干活。He hardly works at all.他很少干活。2.You have come too late.你来得太晚了。Have you see him lately?你最近见到过他吗?3.The person who talks most is often the one who doesleast.说得最 多的人常常干得最少。The audience consisted mostly of women.观众大部分是女的。4.The next flight dose not go direct to Tokyo; it goes byway of Shanghai.下趟航班不直飞东京 ,而是绕道上海。He will be here directly.他马上就来。5.The rider pulled his horse up short.骑手突然一下把马勒住。Make a right turn shortly beyond the village. 村前不远处往右拐。6.Please stand clear of the gate.请不要站在门前。He stated his view-point clealy.他很清楚明白地阐述了自己的观点。7.The exam was pretty difficult.这次考试相当难。Her little girls are always prettily dressed.她的小女孩穿着总是很 漂亮。(二)这类词主要有wide,widely;close, closely ;high,highly等 等,这两种副词形式不同,含义 也有差别,但是没有第一类的区别明显,而且 翻译成汉语时用词也很接近。所以使用时很容易混淆。这类词含 义及用法上的 主要特点是:不带-ly的副词表示具体的行为和动作,说明的动作或状况有可测 量性和可见性;而 以-ly结尾的同源副词所表达的常常是抽象性的行为和状况。 这时,这些词大都具有"greatly"和"extremel y"的含义。试作如下比较:1.Do you see that butterfly flying high above the street?你是否看 见那只蝴蝶在街道上方高高飞舞 着?The distinguished guests were highly praised.贵宾们受到了高度赞扬。 2.He flung the door wide open.他猛地把门开得大大的。We were widely different on many questions.我们在许多问题上分歧很 大。3.You will have to pay dear for that telescope.买那个望远镜你得付 很高的价钱。You will pay dearly for the insult. 对这样的侮辱你将付出高昂的代价。4.She stood close against the wall.她紧挨着墙站着。The police were watching him closely.警察在密切监视他。5.The bird is now flying quite low.鸟儿现在飞得非常低。He bowed lowly before the queen.他谦恭地给女王鞠了一躬。6.They had to dig deep to reach water.他们挖得很深才挖到水。 You have offended him deeply.你冒犯他可不轻。7.Grace is holding tight to Paul.格雷斯紧紧地搂抱着保罗。The passengers were packed tightly in the train.火车车箱里挤满了乘 客。8.Mr. Cole tends to speak rather loud.科尔先生说话声音总是很大。Mr. Cole boasted loudly of his power. 科尔先生大肆夸耀自己的权力。(三)这类词主要有slow,slowly;quick,quickly等等异形同义词。当 然,现代英语的语言规范性要求 用以-ly 结尾的副词来修饰动词,但由于句子 结构以及搭配的不同,使用时也具有不同的倾向性。在此,主要 探讨一下在什 么情况下常使用不带-ly的副词形式。同时, 把第二类中一些适应于下列规则 的词也包括进去。 总的说来,倾向于使用不带-ly副词形式的情况大致有下列 四种:Ⅰ 用作比较级或最高级时:1.Allen was walking quickly, but George was walking evenquicker.艾伦走得很快,但乔治走得更快 。2.The men were quarreling loudly, but the policemenshouted louder.那些人在大声争吵着,但 是警察喊叫得更响。 3.The car went slower and slower until it came to a stand still.汽车走得越来越慢,最后停了下 来。4.Let's see who can run quickest.我们来看看谁跑得最快。5.We must look closer at the problem. 我们必须更加仔细地查看这一问题。 Ⅱ 有"so"或"too"修饰时: 1.It all happened so quick that I could do nothing. 这一切发生得如 此之快以致于我手足无措无法 对付了。2.It is impossible to overtake him; your car goes tooslow.不可能赶 上他了,你的车太慢了。3.Don't talk so loud; the child is in bed now.别这样大声说话,孩子 已经睡了。 Ⅲ 用于修饰表示移动、天气等常用动词时: 1.Come quick; we are waiting for you. 快来,我们在等你。2.Drive slow; this part of the road is dangerous.车开慢一点,这段 路很危险。3.The sun shines bright.阳光明媚。 4.When we left the shelter, the snow was falling thickand the wind was blowing cold.我们 离开那棚屋时,正下着大雪,刮着寒风。5.Business is going strong.生意兴隆。Ⅳ 在固定词组中或当用于修饰它经常固定搭配的动词时:1.Take it easy.不要紧张。 2.Stand firm and hold it tight.站稳抓牢。3.He often plays high.他赌注常下得很大。4.The secretary copied the rough draft of her manager outfair.秘书 把经理那份粗潦的草稿很清 楚地誊写出来。5.They were drinking deep in the fort deep into the night.他们在城 堡中痛饮到深夜。通过观察,以上三类词中第一类较易区别、掌握和使用。对于后两类词,在 判别使用哪一种副词形式时一 般可以考虑以下几个原则:第一是具体性与抽象 性的原则。在表示实实在在的物体活动、位置移动或具体可见 的状况和变化时, 常使用不带-ly的副词形式,如:climb high,live close by,open wide,sink deep,tu rn sharp right;反之,具有抽象含义的动词常用以-ly结尾的副词, 如:think highly of,look closely into,love dearly等等。第二个原则就是常用固定搭配与灵活搭配的不同。 在一些固定词组或经常搭配使用 的词组中,不带-ly 的副词形式使用得很多, 如aim high,run high,fight fair,goeasy with,drink de ep,sleep sound 等等。第三个原则是口语体与标准体的使用区别。如有人说"Speak loudly and clearly. "也有人说"Speak loud and clear."对此情况难说谁对谁错,只能 说前一种说法属于规范性语体;而后一种 说法属于口语体。不带-ly 的简单形 式是早期英语遗留下来的口语体形式。例如现在还有人说"I badneed t his sort of material."就如G.O.寇姆在〈英语句法〉(Syntax)一书中说过的,带-ly 的副词是标准语或 好的口语, 但在松散的口语和大众语中人们仍然坚持使用没 有-ly的简单形式。根据以上原则,可以解释为什么可以说"Don't talk so loud. "但必须说 "He protested/complained loudly。"Talk loud 是常用的搭配形式,而且talk一词的形象也比较具 体;protest与complain 则是搭配性 很强的词, 还常常和许多别的副词灵活 搭配, 如publicly,sharply,secretly等等。另外,这两个词比talk更具 感情色彩,所以也就更具抽象性。

简短英文论文阅读

165 评论(11)

甜蜜到腻

英语写作能力是大学英语教学阶段对学生语言能力培养的一个重要方面,而议论文又是英语写作中常用的文体。以下是我为大家整理的关于300字英语议论文带翻译,给大家作为参考,欢迎阅读!

300字英语议论文带翻译篇1

With the development scientific technology and the improvement of people’s life standard, a growing number of e-books have been available for the readers. Therefore, some people hold the idea that e-books will replace traditional books in the future, because the former is more advantageous than the latter, such as more convenient and less expensive.

随着科技的发展和人们生活水平的提高,读者可以看到越来越多的电子书。因此,有些人认为电子书在未来会取代传统书籍,因为前者比后者更有优势,如更方便和更便宜。

However, as far as I am concerned, e-books will not and cannot replace traditional books. First, compared with traditional books, we cannot get the same pleasure from reading e-books in that e-books are easier to make our eyes to be tired and dry when reading. Second, with concern about copyright, there are many books are not available in digital form, especially classics. In other words, the resource of e-books is quite limited and cannot satisfy the readers. Third, there is a function of traditional books that e-books do not have—as a gift and a collection. I suppose that those who love reading would be willing to keep a printed form even though he has read the electronic form of it.

然而,我认为电子书不会、也不能取代传统书籍。首先,与传统书籍相比,从电子书中我们不能获得同样的乐趣,因为电子书阅读的时候更容易使我们的眼睛累,干燥。第二,因为版权问题,有许多书是没有电子形式,尤其是一些经典著作。换句话说,电子书的资源是非常有限,无法满足读者。第三,传统书籍有一个电子书没有的功能——作为礼物或拿来收集。我想那些爱阅读的人会愿意保存着纸质版的书,尽管他已经阅读过电子版的了。

In a word, traditional books will continue to be the most important form in our reading.

总之,在阅读方面,传统书籍会一直成为最重要的形式。

300字英语议论文带翻译篇2

Recent decades have seen the rapid development of information technology. It plays a significant role in our daily life. According, our reading habits changes a lot, because there are more and more e-books come to our daily life. There is no doubt that e-books makes reading more convenient and comfortable. Therefore, there are hot debates about e-books will replace traditional books.

最近几十年已经见证了信息技术的飞速发展。它在我们的日常生活中扮演着重要的角色。随之,我们的阅读习惯改变了很多,因为在我们的日常生活中有越来越多的电子书。毫无疑问,电子书使阅读更方便和舒适。因此,关于电子书会取代传统书籍产生了激烈辩论。

Some people assert that e-books will replace traditional books. The following vies can support their views. In the first place, we have been used to reading e-books. When we want to do some reading, we may first search in on the Internet. Moreover, it saves us time and money. With e-books, we don’t have to go to the library to borrow or go to the bookstore to buy. Last but not least, at present, plenty of people like to reading books on the phone or computer, which is convenient to carry.

一些人认为电子书会取代传统书籍。以下的理由是支持他们的观点的。首先,我们已经习惯于阅读电子书。当我们想阅读的时候,我们首先可能会先在互联网上搜索。此外,电子书节约时间和金钱。有了电子书,我们不用去图书馆借阅或去书店买。最后但并非最不重要的,如今很多人们喜欢在便于携带的手机或电脑上阅读。

From the discussion above, I think in the future, the e-books will replace the traditional ones.

通过以上讨论,我认为在未来,电子书将会代替传统书籍。

300字英语议论文带翻译篇3

With the development of technology, more and more electric books are used by people; in the meantime, many people still read traditional books. I think both of them have their own advantages and disadvantages.

随着科技的发展,越来越多的人使用电子书;与此同时,很多人仍然在看传统书籍。我觉得两者都有优点和缺点。

Electric books and traditional books can be very different from each other. Electric books are light to carry, and they are so divers that you can read them on your mobile phone, MP4. To the contrary, the quality of traditional books can be well guaranteed. Moreover, most of electric books are network novel, and most of traditional books are professional books. Many people enjoy reading traditional book. Finally, if you read the electric book too long, you will feel dizzy with agitation. So reading the traditional books can make you healthy.

电子图书与传统书籍是非常不一样的。电子书很容易携带,他们是如此的不同,你可以看看你的手机,MP4上看。与此相反,传统图书的质量可以得到很好的保证。而且,大多数的电子图书都是网络小说,而传统的书籍则是专业书。许多人喜欢阅读传统书籍。最后,如果你看电子书刊太长时间,你会觉得头晕与心闷。所以阅读传统书籍可以让你健康。

However, they have one thing in common that is they provide us knowledge. I think they will develop better in the future to make up their disadvantages.

199 评论(15)

相关问答