Due to the international relations have observed that the external and internal phenomenon observed on international relations， so that the research process should include two aspects: one is to its external phenomena， also want to observe its intrinsic meaning Here， in the judgement of the proper attribute to observe and interpretation of different aspects， and shall be properly， is very If the wrong way， it will lead to a significant For example， whether saddam hussein Iraq with weapons of mass destruction， it is a need through verification () to corroborate the problem， but the United States is to the interpretation of false information to make a firm conclusion， and launched the From the perspective of methodology， this is a typical The researchers observed facts can treat the observation， the purpose is a clear objective truth， truth and determined on the basis of the relationship between the In so doing， the researchers must adhere to the objective， namely， seeking truth from The researchers observed， mainly including qualitatively and In the study of war， for example， to judge a violent conflict or war， is based on qualitative observe global conflict， digital description of the development of the situation， quantitative In international relations studies， some facts is suitable for quantitative observation， but also some facts is difficult to For example， terrorist incidents caused terror atmosphere， people can feel， but it is hard for quantitative analysis， because this fact is reflected people's mental
As both international relations and the fact that the phenomenon can be observed outside the inner meaning and can not be observed， so the fact of international relations， the process should include two aspects: it is necessary to observe its external behavior， but also its inner meaning for Here， the fact that the properties of the appropriate judge， on the need for different aspects of observation and interpretation， respectively， for proper observation and interpretation， it is very If handled the wrong way， it can lead to significant deviations For example， whether Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq has weapons of mass destruction is a need verification (observation) to confirm the problem， but the United States has the means to interpret false information to a conclusion， and thus started the war From the methodological point of view， this is a typical counter- The researchers treated the facts can be observed side to observe the purpose is to figure out the objective truth of the facts， and on this basis to determine the relationship between In doing so， researchers must adhere to objective observation， that is The researchers observed the way， summed up in two types of qualitative and To a case study of the war， to judge a violent conflict or war， is of qualitative observation， according to figures describe the situation of global conflict development， it is a quantitative Research in international relations， some more suitable for quantitative observation of the facts， but some facts are difficult to For example， terrorism， climate of fear caused by the incident， one can clearly sense， but its extent is difficult to make quantitative analysis， because this fact is reflected in people's psychological
