英语会计论文

q我 帮你

诚信是会计工作的灵魂，是会计人员应遵守的职业道德，会计核算应当以实际发生的交易或事项为依据，如实反映企业的财务状况和经营成果，但是现实中由于种种原因有些单位的会计人员诚信缺失，弄虚作假，致使会计资料失真，给社会造成严重的危害。 Honesty is the soul of accounting work, is accounting personnel should abide by professional ethics, accounting shall use of actual transactions or events as the basis, and truthfully reflect the enterprise's financial position and operating results, but in reality, due to various reasons some units of accounting personnel, which lack of credibility, fraudulent accounting information distortion, causing serious harm to the society. 本文探讨了会计诚信的内涵，对会计诚信缺失的危害性、成因做出了具体分析并结合我国的实际情况提出了一系列有关完善会计诚信制度的对策，希望全社会都能行动起来，“以诚实守信为荣，以见利忘义为耻”为行动准则，营造良好诚信的社会氛围，让诚实守信者得到回报，让弄虚作假者无生存之地，使会计诚实守信原则深入人心，使市场经济秩序更加科学合理。 This paper discussed the connotation of accounting sincerity, the lack of accounting credibility harmfulness, cause made specific analysis and combining with the actual situation of China put forward a series of accounting sincerity on perfecting system of entire society measures, and hopes to action, "honesty, ashamed of forgotting proud of action rule," to create good good faith society ShouXinZhe atmosphere, let a honest, who returns to live, without fraudulent accounting honesty principle to thorough popular feeling, make the order of the market economy more scientific and reasonable.

CONCLUSION The Committee believes that calls for separate private company GAAP should be framed within the legal and institutional environment of each country. If public and private companies are subject to the same financial reporting requirements, as in many IASB countries, then the need for separate private company GAAP might be justified within an appropriate cost-benefit framework. In contrast, private companies in the U.S. are not required to comply with public company GAAP. Given this difference in the institutional environment, calls for private company GAAP in the U.S. must consider the demand for and supply of financial reporting information in the current private company marketplace. Survey research in the U.S. indicates that private company users find public company GAAP financial statements to have significant decision usefulness, and to be cost-benefit effective. In addition, evidence suggests that when the cost-benefit calculus is not favorable, market forces lead to deviations from GAAP. While some assert that the needs of private company financial statement users differ from those of public company stakeholders, the Committee does not find clear evidence of differential user needs or a clear articulation of how differential needs would lead to a framework for GAAP that differs from the current public company financial reporting requirements in the U.S. Overall, if there is demand for separate private company GAAP, then market forces, rather than standard setters, may be better at meeting the differential information needs of variousprivatecompanystakeholders. The Committee does not see a persuasive argument for standard setters to create a separate private company GAAP in the U.S.结论 该委员会认为要求独立的私人公司一般公认会计原则应裱在法律和制度环境的。如果公共和私人公司有相同的财务报告的要求,在许多国家,并在此基础上,需要IASB进行为独立的私人公司公认会计准则的称义在适当的财政框架。相比之下,私营企业在美国也不需要符合上市公司一般公认会计原则。鉴于此,分别在制度环境呼吁私人公司一般公认会计原则在美国必须考虑需求和供给的财务报告信息在当前的私人公司的市场。 调查研究表明,在美国上市公司,用户找到私人公司财务报表有显著的公认会计准则决策有用性、利益有效。此外,有证据表明,在财政微积分并非有利,市场力量导致偏离公认会计准则的前提下。虽然有些断言的需要,民营企业财务报表使用者不同利益相关者的上市公司,委员会不会发现明显的证据表明微分用户需求或一个清晰的清晰度的需求导致了差,不同于一般公认会计原则框架当前上市公司财务报告的要求,在美国的整体,如果有需求,独立的私人公司公认会计准则的前提下,市场力量,而非标准者,可以更好地满足需求. variousprivatecompanystakeholders微分信息该委员会也不觉得有说服力的论据为准则制定者去创造一个独立的私人公司一般公认会计原则在美国